Re: treesit indentation "blinking"

[Yuan Fu]

> On Mar 22, 2023, at 9:51 PM, Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> wrote:
> 
> On March 22, 2023 21:03:29 Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> On Mar 22, 2023, at 5:07 PM, Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On March 22, 2023 20:00:23 Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 22, 2023, at 1:49 PM, Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there a general-purpose through which we can avoid line indentation
>>>>> oscillating as the user types when the AST is temporarily invalid,
>>>>> e.g. after '(' or '{'? I'm checking out the C++ tree-sitter mode, and
>>>>> one of the more disconcerting things is the current line's indentation
>>>>> changing rapidly as I type. Is it feasible to create ERROR recovery
>>>>> indentation rules for every conceivable situation?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, but in reality, I think all we need is a couple special case for the 
>>>> unmatched ( and {’s. Can you think of other cases of blinking indentations?
>>>> 
>>>> Yuan
>>> 
>>> But TS reacts to missing closing brackets by clarifying the whole nearby 
>>> expression as ERROR. It's not, as would be more useful, saying "here's a 
>>> stray (, and everything else is normal and parsed as if that ( were absent”
>> 
>> We can just look at the buffer text directly: if there’s an ERROR and the 
>> previous char (after skipping whitespace chars) is ( or {, we know what to do
> 
> 
> Do we know what to do? That ERROR might be arbitrarily far up the parse tree. 
> I don't think it's as easy as you think it might be. One strategy that might 
> work is to see whether adding a "(" introduced an error, and, if so, 
> temporarily replacing that "(" with whitespace, reparsing, and then using the 
> resulting parse tree instead of the one with the "(" to do indentation and 
> fontification. This way, I think you'd end up without the random jumping 
> around we see today in TS modes.

We can place this special rule at the end of our rule list, and previous rules 
not matching should indicated “error” by itself. Of course, I can’t prove it by 
using this method to fix the blinking indent, but I don’t quite have the time 
for it right now.

Yuan