[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :cor
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages? |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Mar 2023 15:19:20 +0200 |
> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 14:41:17 -0800
>
> What are the implications of turning something into a :core package? I can’t
> find much description of it. If my understanding of it is correct, I think it
> would be beneficial to make new tree-sitter modes into :core packages. Right
> now they are pretty bare-bones, and haven’t been “battle-tested”. Making them
> core packages would allow us gradually improve them and fix errors that come
> up. Those files I mentioned in the subject are new files, if that matters.
> But I don’t know if there are any downsides of turning something into a :core
> package.
>
> The new tree-sitter related files we have are:
> - c-ts-mode.el
> - java-ts-mode.el
> - rust-ts-mode.el
> - go-ts-mode.el
> - dockerfile-ts-mode.el
> - cmake-ts-mode.el
> - yaml-ts-mode.el
> - typescript-ts-mode.el
> - ruby-ts-mode.el
> - toml-ts-mode.el
>
> And we have a few “combined” files:
> - python.el (already a :core package)
> - js.el
> - sh-script.el
Isn't :core only relevant for ELPA packages and not for something that
is bundled with Emacs?
- Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Yuan Fu, 2023/03/05
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Holger Schurig, 2023/03/07
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Turning c-ts-mode.el, go-ts-mode.el, csharp-ts-mode.el etc into :core packages?, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/03/07