Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

Philip Kaludercic [2022-09-30 08:27 +0000] wrote:

> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Now that we're getting closer to merging eglot, I think it is our last
>> chance to (re-)consider that "eglot" is not the ideal name.  It has some
>> charm, of course, but it is quite non-descriptive and it's hard (read:
>> impossible) to understand what it does based on the name alone.[1]
>
> I can only agree.  Especially because there are a number of packages
> starting with "el...", which makes misreading the package name as
> "elgot" very easy (which is still how I pronounce the package when
> speaking to this day).

If we just changed the default language of Emacs to Greek, "Eglot" would
automatically become a lot more palatable ;).  Maybe for Emacs 30 🤞.

-- 
Basil "playing with global-cheat-mode enabled"