Re: master updated (5af5ed6c62 -> f07505d1ec)

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com> writes:

> Hmm, in that case, I think my patch would be hiding a real bug (though
> possibly just a bug in that test). I'll see if I can force it to fail
> locally, or failing that, we can mark it unstable. I think that would
> be better than working around the bug in the test...

Yup.

In the last run on EMBA, that test didn't fail, but this one did:

Test esh-proc-test/sigpipe-exits-process condition:
    (ert-test-failed
     ((should
       (eq
        (process-list)
        nil))
      :form
      (eq
       (#<process sh-stderr>)
       nil)
      :value nil))
   FAILED  16/16  esh-proc-test/sigpipe-exits-process (1.013610 sec) at 
lisp/eshell/esh-proc-tests.el:122
Ran 16 tests, 14 results as expected, 1 unexpected, 1 skipped (2022-09-07 
10:27:03+0000, 2.594968 sec)
1 unexpected results:
   FAILED  esh-proc-test/sigpipe-exits-process  ((should (eq
    (process-list) nil)) :form (eq (#<process sh-stderr>) nil) :value
    nil)

Also native-comp.

https://emba.gnu.org/emacs/emacs/-/jobs/53405