Re: master updated (5af5ed6c62 -> f07505d1ec)

[Jim Porter]

On 9/6/2022 1:13 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Sounds good to me.  Try pushing it and see what EMBA says...  (By the
> way, I see now that the test doesn't fail reliably on EMBA -- it passed
> at least once.  So perhaps there's some timing/pipelining issue here?
> That is, it's outputting "first" and then "\n" in two separate writes,
> but sometimes we get both in the same process output and sometimes in
> two bits?)

Hmm, in that case, I think my patch would be hiding a real bug (though 
possibly just a bug in that test). I'll see if I can force it to fail 
locally, or failing that, we can mark it unstable. I think that would be 
better than working around the bug in the test...