Re: master f4af1137e6: Bind print-symbols-bare to t in byte-compile-from-buffer

[Stefan Monnier]

> -  (let ((print-symbols-bare t))
> +  (let ((print-symbols-bare t))         ; Possibly redundant binding.
>      (macroexpand `(declare-function ,fn ,file ,@args))))

Why do we need this binding here?
This is just a `macroexpand`, so it's not expected to print anything
at all.  What kind of prints are supposed to be affected, and if so, why
should it be solved by a let-binding here rather than elsewhere, such
as maybe in `macroexpand`?


        Stefan