Re: Contradictiory directions

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

> I think the idea is that for us to _distribute_ a version of Emacs that
> allows to dynamically load proprietary modules is wrong and sets a bad
> example for the GNU project.

It is impossible to disallow such a thing, so I'm not sure what your
point is.

>> The industry standard is allowlist/blocklist.
>
> If so, it is certainly a standard I don't know about.  In nearly three
> decades, I've heard many variants of "list", but never "allowlist" or
> "blocklist".  Can we agree to use the terminology that everyone knows
> about in Emacs, to keep the situation simple?

Seems simple enough to me.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no