Re: [ELPA] Add embark

[Philip Kaludercic]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> The only issue is that all but one contributor has signed the copyright
>> assignment[1].  Yet Protesilaos Stavrou claims his contributions do not
>> amount to a "significant contribution", and thus should not block the
>> addition of Embark to GNU ELPA[2]:
>
> [ At first I read the above to mean that Protesilaos was claiming that
>   his own contributions were insignificant, implying that he was the
>   last remaining contributor not covered by paperwork, which made me
>   doubt my memory, so I went to double check and after finding that he
>   indeed had signed the paperwork I finally re-read the above and
>   understood what you meant ;-)  ]

Whoops, I recognize the potential for confusion, phrased that stupidly.
To clarify, an anonymous contributor "DK" hasn't responded to the call to
add Embark to GNU ELPA, but it turns out that they didn't contribute
enough to prevent the package from being added.

> Indeed, I confirm his analysis.  Some of those contributions can still
> be traced to the latest code, but it's small enough to fall below the
> "trivial" threshold, IMO.

Ok, great! I will add the "embark" and "embark-consult" packages then.

-- 
        Philip Kaludercic