RE: [External] : Re: NonGNU ELPA work

[Stefan Kangas]

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

> Is it supposed to mean code distributed by GNU
> Emacs (e.g., in one of its repositories) that's
> not considered _part of_ GNU Emacs?

Yes.

> Is it meant to stand for code that doesn't respect some GNU standards?

Packages in NonGNU ELPA mainly need to conform to some basic
philosophical standards, such as not recommending proprietary software.

> Code that isn't assigned to FSF/GNU?

Yes, otherwise it should go to GNU ELPA.