|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Gitlab Migration |
Date: | Mon, 30 Aug 2021 00:13:51 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
On 29.08.2021 10:42, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:- Rebasing. Some of our valued contributors are not 100% comfortable with the more advanced features of Git, rebasing included. Our general recommendation until now has been to prefer merge commits.Well, one of the co-maintainers is sceptical towards rebasing, and the other one uses it exclusively, so I don't think we currently have any recommendation on the matter.
Whenever a question arose about a recommended workflow from someone who claims not to understand Git well, the recommendation always came in the form "use merges, not rebase". Which is a good suggestion, I think.
A well-done rebase is indistinguishable from a "normal" branch, so of course there is no point in prohibiting their use.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |