emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Suggest installing more fonts?


From: Gregory Heytings
Subject: Re: Suggest installing more fonts?
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:20:37 +0000
User-agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19)


Even Unifont only supports the BMP and little else.

That's wrong. Unifont supports 100% of the BMP (including many scripts for fictional scripts such as Klingon, which are not offically part of Unicode), most of the SMP (the exceptions are cuneiform and hieroglyphs), a few glyphs of SIP.

Which is essentially what I said.


Aha. So the 80%-90% coverage of the SMP (the exceptions being cuneiform and hieroglyphs) by Unifont is essentially nothing? And its ~8000 glyphs for fictional scripts is essentially nothing? All in all, Unifont contains all glyphs needed by about 99.95% of the world population. It's more than clear that you dislike Unifont, you are entitled to your opinions, but I believe it is important to do justice to what others did.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]