Re: PL support

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 10.05.2020 01:23, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> On 09/05/2020 17.49, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> > On 09.05.2020 22:55, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> > > Let's not be too hasty with calling the debate silly.  I don't use either lsp-mode or 
> > > eglot but I do see strong opinions in favor of both, and "blessing" one as 
> > > official, especially a (currently) less popular one, can cause sour feelings and give the 
> > > perception that emacs-devel is being insular.
> > In principle, I disagree: as long as Eglot is maintained and works well, we*should*  
> > present it as "blessed", and we can do that in introduction videos, 
> > documentation, tutorials, etc.
> But why more than lsp-mode?

Because they choose to participate in the "core" Emacs development very 
little?

And because they chose not to get included in GNU ELPA, which would be a 
"reward" in itself (oob availability for new users). We couldn't mention 
packages not in GNU ELPA in documentation as prominently anyway.