Re: PL support

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 09.05.2020 22:55, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> Let's not be too hasty with calling the debate silly.  I don't use either lsp-mode or 
> eglot but I do see strong opinions in favor of both, and "blessing" one as 
> official, especially a (currently) less popular one, can cause sour feelings and give the 
> perception that emacs-devel is being insular.

In principle, I disagree: as long as Eglot is maintained and works well, 
we *should* present it as "blessed", and we can do that in introduction 
videos, documentation, tutorials, etc.

After all, adding it to GNU ELPA was a good move, one that will benefit 
Emacs users at large.