emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PL support


From: Clément Pit-Claudel
Subject: Re: PL support
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 18:23:14 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

On 09/05/2020 17.49, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 09.05.2020 22:55, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
>> Let's not be too hasty with calling the debate silly.  I don't use either 
>> lsp-mode or eglot but I do see strong opinions in favor of both, and 
>> "blessing" one as official, especially a (currently) less popular one, can 
>> cause sour feelings and give the perception that emacs-devel is being 
>> insular.
> 
> In principle, I disagree: as long as Eglot is maintained and works well, we 
> *should* present it as "blessed", and we can do that in introduction videos, 
> documentation, tutorials, etc.

But why more than lsp-mode?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]