[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDI+ take 3
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: GDI+ take 3 |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:50:38 +0300 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:31:40 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> > Are the values of delay returned by w32_frame_delay similar to what
> > you get with libgif animation?
>
> Sorry, I don't understand. With the native animation w32_frame_delay returns
> 6.
>
> 253 status = GdipImageSelectActiveFrame (pBitmap,
> &pDimensionIDs[0],
> (gdb) n
> 255 *delay = w32_frame_delay (pBitmap, frame);
> (gdb) n
> 256 *nframes = frameCount;
> (gdb) p *delay
> $1 = 6
> (gdb)
Btw, isn't the code wrong? AFAIU by reading relevant discussions on
the Internet, we should be looking at
*(long *)propertyItem[frame].value
instead of at propertyItem[frame].length. The latter gives the length
of the value in bytes or something. Hmm...
- Re: GDI+ take 3, (continued)
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Alan Third, 2020/04/20
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juan José García-Ripoll, 2020/04/21
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/19
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juan José García-Ripoll, 2020/04/19
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/20
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juan José García-Ripoll, 2020/04/21
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/21
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Juan José García-Ripoll, 2020/04/21
- Re: GDI+ take 3,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
re: GDI+ take 3, Angelo Graziosi, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Angelo Graziosi, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Angelo Graziosi, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/15
- Re: GDI+ take 3, Angelo Graziosi, 2020/04/15