Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs)

[Andrea Corallo]

Tuấn-Anh Nguyễn <address@hidden> writes:

> In principle (not in tree-sitter ATM), and in very specific cases, yes.
> IMO that's the wrong focus on a premature optimization anyway. As others
> noted, even in the pathological case of xdisp.c, the performance is
> acceptable. 

Please do not assume xdisp.c is the worst case scenario, I can testify
it is not :)

Andrea

-- 
address@hidden