[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:57:26 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Other completion styles don't highlight completions-first-difference
>>> at all. I'm not sure if only the "basic" completion style highlights
>>> completions-first-difference.
>>
>> Eh. I removed it recently, without asking anyone, waiting for
>> someone to complain. :-)
>>
>> Are you complaining? :-) If you are, I'll revert that bit. If you aren't
>> I probably should revert it too...
>
> No, I'm not complaining. Wait for real complaints from someone
> who will really get angry at your changes. Or you could revert
> preemptively to avoid such angry complaints. :-)
Yes, probably a good idea.
> Or implement a solution that satisfies everyone: since in completion
> styles other than "basic", there are many characters that you can type
> to narrow completion further, is it possible to mark all them with
> completions-first-difference?
Yes, but no. In the flex style, every character besides the one you've
already entered will potentially narrow the completion further. So
you'd be left with a negative image than what we want. Do I explain
myself.
And "what we want" is for it to work more like Company, Helm, or other
editors and UI's out there in the wild: show prominently the places in
the candidate where the pattern matches.
João
- BIKESHED: completion faces, Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/26
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/27
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/27
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/28
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/29
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/10/29