[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2019 00:43:59 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
> bold in completions-first-difference helps to immediately see the
> next character to type to narrow completions further.
<mild bikeshedding starts>
Yes, but some questions, Juri:
* wouldn't any other face, say "underline", serve the same purpose?
* would you not be equally and efficiently informed of such facts if
completions-common-part were _more_ prominent and
completions-first-difference was _less_ prominent?
* In completion styles other than "basic", there are many other
characters, besides the one marked with completions-first-difference,
that you type to narrow completion further, right?
>> - underlined (tho I don't like underlined text very much)?
>> - some foreground color?
> For several years I've been using completions-common-part
> inherited from the 'shadow' face, and it works pretty well
> for this purpose.
Do you use mainly the "basic" completion style? I.e. do you customize
"completion-styles"?
Thanks,
João
- BIKESHED: completion faces, Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/26
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/27
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/27
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces,
João Távora <=
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/28
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/28
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/28
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/29
Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/10/29