[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BIKESHED: completion faces
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
BIKESHED: completion faces |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2019 21:58:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
In Emacs-26, completion faces looked like the following:
- the "common" part shown like the default face.
- the "first-difference" shown in bold.
- everything else uses the default face.
The "common" part is the part applied to the characters that are also
found in the current minibuffer. E.g. when completing
M-x ne-li ?
the "ne" and "-li" chars in the *Completions* are the "common" part.
With the basic, prefix completion, the "common" part is not very
important and is separated from the rest at the "first-difference", so
the default faces make a fair bit of sense there.
But for other completion styles such as `substring`,
`partial-completion`, and even more so for `flex`, it's not always
immediately obvious how the minibuffer contents relate to the possible
completions displayed in *Completions*.
For this reason, it is common in other completion systems to
highlight the "common" part somehow (e.g. underline, bold, ...).
I think Emacs's defaults should be changed so that the "common" part
(which uses the `completions-common-part` face) is highlighted somehow.
So, what should we go for:
- bold (but then we need to change the `completions-first-difference`
face to keep it different, e.g. underlined)?
- underlined (tho I don't like underlined text very much)?
- some foreground color?
- some background color?
- something else?
Stefan
- BIKESHED: completion faces,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/27
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/27
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/27
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/28
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/28
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, João Távora, 2019/10/29
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/28
- Re: BIKESHED: completion faces, Juri Linkov, 2019/10/29