[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29)
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29) |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Oct 2019 12:19:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 10/6/19 11:53 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Was it (a) or (b), according to your interpretation?
Partly (a) and partly (b). Really, it doesn't matter.
we will keep
bumping at this and arguing about such changes in the future.
I'm not arguing about the change now. As I said, please feel free to revert
whatever part of it that you dislike (though I suggest keeping the bug fixes). I
don't think unimportant little cases like this are worth either your time or
mine (though perhaps we'll have to disagree about that as well :-).
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), (continued)
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29),
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/10/05
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2019/10/05