[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29) |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Oct 2019 19:03:22 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 11:20:24 -0400
>
> > That's it. And I personally can see no confusion in the likes of
> > "[-+]", whereas I did need to consult the manual to learn that "[+-]"
> > is also right. So at least for me, the confusion worked the other way
> > around.
>
> As discussed here a while back, putting `-` as the last char is actually
> the only choice which always works (because it can't be the first char
> when that first char has to be `]`), so I recommend to always put `-` as
> the last char.
That's unrelated. I was talking about modifying _existing_ code, not
about writing new code.
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/04
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06