[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29) |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:53:02 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 10:33:34 -0700
>
> On 10/6/19 10:19 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Can we please agree to make stylistic changes only if either (a) the
> > change is in the code which is being modified/fixed anyway, or (b) the
> > change doesn't affect the code produced from the modified source?
>
> That's what I did in this particular instance.
Was it (a) or (b), according to your interpretation?
> Obviously you disagree, but that's what I thought at the time, and
> still do. Let's just agree to disagree; it's not worth arguing
> about.
We cannot agree to disagree on this, because it means we will keep
bumping at this and arguing about such changes in the future. I'm
trying to find a compromise that we all could live with.
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), (continued)
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Stefan Monnier, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Paul Eggert, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/10/06
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/10/05
- Re: Emacs regexp scan (Sep 29), Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2019/10/05