Re: Towards a cleaner build

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> I'd prefer if we made the byte-compiler warnings smarter in this
> case.  It shouldn't behave like we are shooting ourselves in the foot
> in these cases.
>
> Do we have a means to tell the byte-compiler "don't emit this specific
> warning for that function"?  If not, perhaps we should.

Yes, that would be very nice.  Perhaps a general er form?  Like...

(without-byte-compilation-warnings
  ...)

Hm, that's perhaps too general.  What about:

(without-byte-compilation-warning 'callargs
  ...)


-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no