Re: Replace trivial pcase occurrences in the Emacs sources

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 30.10.2018 22:46, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Couldn't we also say that a pattern with "holes" is a destructuring pattern,
> > not matter if it is used in pcase-let, or just pcase?
>
> We could, but the reason why I'm trying to define a new term (which
> I called here "destructuring pattern") is to define what happens with
> pcase-let, pcase-dolist, pcase-let* where the pattern is assumed
> to match.

I only meant to say that introducing a term that somebody fairly 
familiar with the subject might misinterpret without reading its 
definition in the manual, could be suboptimal.

But don't mind me, I don't have any alternative proposals anyway.