[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?
From: |
George Plymale II |
Subject: |
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port? |
Date: |
Sat, 19 May 2018 11:49:01 -0400 |
Nick Helm <address@hidden> writes:
> You're right, the mac-port doesn't exhibit this particular bug. However,
> it's not perfect in this area either, due to it using many of the same
> techniques. (Your screenshot actually illustrates my point – the
> Lisp-derived menu items shouldn't be visible while the Spotlight for
> Help search field is active.
I'm a little confused by this -- you're saying that the info nodes
(which I suppose are the Lisp-derived menu items) should _not_ be
visible?
> You'll also likely find that this issue doesn't happen every time you
> open Help).
Which issue are you referring to?
> IMO, the mac-port is a good option, but NS is catching up and has even
> leapt ahead in some keys ways in the last year or so.
Just out of curiosity, in what ways has NS leapt ahead?
- Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/15
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/15
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/15
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/15
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/18
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/18
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?,
George Plymale II <=
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Van L, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/22
- Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Van L, 2018/05/22
- Re: Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Alan Third, 2018/05/23