Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file

[Clément Pit-Claudel]

On 2017-04-07 12:02, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> Sorry, was too late at night I guess.  For batch mode, it’s code
> loaded via -l options that might have to add new explicit
> dependencies, if we don’t add autoloads for everything.  I would
> expect autoloads would be the direction we’d want to go….

Removing some preloaded packages in favor of autoloads is probably a good idea. 
 We should be careful, though: as previously discussed, essentially everything 
in packages that were previously preloaded needs to be autoloaded now, since 
many packages don't (require) the preloaded features that they use.