[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:01:12 -0700 (PDT) |
[More interesting details. Thx.]
> Given a buffer position, we need to be able to find the corresponding
> island chain. "Obviously", we do this with a text property, which we
> might as well call `island', or possibly `chain'. Since successive
> accesses to chain local variables are very likely to be in the same
> chain most of the time, we will cache the "current" chain in buffer
> local variables.
I guess you are referring to the possibility of more than one
chain having an island at point, and wanting to pick up the right
one as the "current" chain - so you check a text property, which
identifies the chain that is currently active. Is that right?
> When it comes to movement and search primitives, we want to adapt these
> so that the impact on existing major modes is minimised. Ideally, we
> would want major modes to "see" only their own islands (or lack
> thereof). Thus we treat irrelevant islands as blocks of whitespace. It
> seems to make sense to have such islands matched by subexpressions in
> regexps which match spaces. This would obviate the need to amend a
> great number of regexps currently coded in major modes.
For search, at least, I don't see why you don't make use of
`isearch-filter-predicate'. That's what I do in my code, to
search only within (or without: complement) a set of zones
(~chain of islands). That seems simple and cheap.
[I also optionally dim the non-islands during search (or the
non-non-islands, if complementing), so the areas being searched
stand out more.]
> On the other hand, when a user does C-s or C-M-s, the Right Thing is
> surely to search the buffer as a whole, without regard to islands. We
> therefore need a flag which instructs the primitives how to behave when
> there are islands. We might as well call this flag `in-islands', for
> want of a better name.
`isearch-filter-predicate'. It can let code know whether
you are island-searching or not.
> The user will, from time to time, delete the delimiters which define
> islands, and will insert other ones.
FWIW, markers as delimiters do not have that problem.
[The `isearch-prop.el' code can use zones defined by either
their limits (e.g., markers) or text or overlay properties
on their text. It lets commands like `query-replace' do
similarly.]
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, (continued)
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/21
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/21
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/21
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/21
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/21
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Phillip Lord, 2016/04/20
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/21
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/22
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/04/21
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/22
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/04/22
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/23
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/04/23
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/23
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/23