[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:31:13 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> I have no problem with stuff being in C for performance reasons.
> When that is not critical, keeping stuff in Lisp is good.
>
> Especially for a new and very general feature: let folks play
> with it and experiment with new possibilities. We can later
> optimize any parts we like.
The parts that affect redisplay must at least partially be in C,
because there's no existing infrastructure that I'm aware of that can
be piggy-backed to do this kind of stuff.
- A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/04/20
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/20
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/20
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/04/21
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/21
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/21
- Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/21
- RE: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Drew Adams, 2016/04/21
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Phillip Lord, 2016/04/20
Re: A vision for multiple major modes: some design notes, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/21