[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4K Bugs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: 4K Bugs |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:34:40 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Andreas Röhler <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:14:21 +0100
>
> >> What about getting bugs deleted when not dealt with after some time -
> >> while informing the author?
> > That's be losing information for no good reason. Every bug report
> > provides information about the bug, sometimes the information is very
> > valuable, sometimes less so. We shouldn't lose that information so
> > easily. It hurts no one to have an old bug in the database.
>
> Keeping old bugs provides some burden - otherwise the question wouldn't
> show up.
>
> When digging into old bugs don't see a no rule for all, but some
> indications: The age of the bug, the changes in the specific
> environment, the skill of the investor.
>
> It would minimize losses if the owner of the bug may keep it alive.
I think the balance still tips towards retaining the information. We
can always treat old bugs as "logically deleted", if it bothers
someone.
- Re: 4K Bugs, (continued)
- Re: 4K Bugs, John Wiegley, 2015/12/25
- Re: 4K Bugs, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/12/25
- Re: 4K Bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/25
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/25
- Re: 4K Bugs, Michael Albinus, 2015/12/26
Re: 4K Bugs, Andreas Röhler, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Andreas Röhler, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
Re: 4K Bugs, Per Starbäck, 2015/12/27