[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4K Bugs
From: |
Ivan Shmakov |
Subject: |
Re: 4K Bugs |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:12:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <address@hidden> writes:
>> Semantically, “closed” means that there’s no bug (any more) – that
>> is, the recipe given by the reporter does not reproduce the issue,
>> or the reporter is found to be mistaken on the feature’s intended
>> (and documented) behavior.
> I disagree that this is the semantics of "closed".
That doesn’t sound constructive; what semantics do you suggest?
Of course, there’s always an option of starting a “community
fork” of the Emacs bug tracking system, so that the users can
track the bugs the developers found to be unworthy of being
open.
--
FSF associate member #7257 http://am-1.org/~ivan/ … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A
- Re: 4K Bugs, (continued)
- Re: 4K Bugs, Andreas Röhler, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Andreas Röhler, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs,
Ivan Shmakov <=
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Per Starbäck, 2015/12/27
- Re: 4K Bugs, Andreas Röhler, 2015/12/28
- Re: 4K Bugs, John Wiegley, 2015/12/28
- Re: 4K Bugs, Paul Eggert, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26
- Re: 4K Bugs, John Wiegley, 2015/12/28
- Re: 4K Bugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2015/12/26