[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Oct 2015 01:37:26 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 |
On 10/18/2015 01:28 AM, Przemysław Wojnowski wrote:
I don't think it is possible, because languages are very different and
their
surrounding tooling is very different.
The meanings of "go to definition", "find references" and "complete text
at point" are very much the same across languages. Some refactorings, too.
Yes. And I've looked at EDE at SF
(http://sourceforge.net/p/cedet/git/ci/master/tree/lisp/cedet/ede/).
There's support for many types of projects, build tools, etc. There are
even some tests.
A more idiomatic, Emacs-y API that isn't tied to CEDET, that's friendly
to third-party packages, and doesn't ask its caller to know the
intricacies of EDE's object hierarchies.
You're welcome to work on making EDE more flexible, though. We can
compare progress later.
What's the point of reimplementing that from scratch?
We can reuse code from EDE, if it fits.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/16
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/19
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/20
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/19