[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Oct 2015 01:07:18 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 |
On 10/18/2015 01:03 AM, Przemysław Wojnowski wrote:
I think it is not a problem. An IDE could switch (or enable) language
backend
depending on current language. For C-like (or maybe statically typed in
general) languages (covering most of programming world) could use
Semantic, for
other languages maybe something other (like tern for JS).
It would be better if we could support a set of common operations for
both static and dynamic languages. If those were implemented by Semantic
by static languages, more power to it.
The EDE subthread also brought up some ideas for project.el.
Does that mean that you don't want to reuse EDE, but reimplement everything
from scratch? Don't you think it would be better to reuse what already
is and
just change parts of it to be more flexible?
Have you looked at lisp/progmodes/project.el yet?
Intellij's support for JavaScript is not so great. Compared to Java it
is poor.
Compared to most other JS editors, it's pretty great. Or so I'm told.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/16
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/19
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/20
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/18