[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:47:24 +0200 |
>>>>> On Tue, 08 Sep 2015, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> I disagree. When I search for "Müller" I want it to also match
>> "Muller" because some people (e.g., in French speaking countries)
>> use this as an approximation of the spelling.
> Are you suggesting that searching for ü should match u but not ú or ù?
No, I am not. It is fine if the search would match a u with any
diacritics. It does not make much of a practical difference because
both Múller and Mùller are unlikely spellings.
Ulrich
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, David Kastrup, 2015/09/10
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/10
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/10
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Ulrich Mueller <=
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/02
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/03
RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03