[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:28:14 +0100 |
On 3 Sep 2015 4:08 am, "Jean-Christophe Helary" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:41, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > That goes against long-standing Emacs practice, and I envision strong
> > objections.
>
> Even if the current behavior were to be emulated by appropriate variables?
Yes, and you can count me among those objections.
When I first started with emacs, case folding by default was something I liked a lot, before I ever knew how to configure this stuff.
I also only learned about lax whitespace when it became the default (IIRC). It was a feature that already existed and yet I had no idea because it wasn't default.
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/02
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Artur Malabarba <=
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03