[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:37:13 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
> > Maybe the default is wrong:
> > a should catch only a (and not aAàá etc.)
> > a case modifier would allow a to catch aA
> > and a diacritic modifier would allow a to catch aàá etc.
What are this "case modifier" and "diacritic modifier"?
If they are easy to type, this might be convenient.
If they are hard, I think the existing default is better for
handling case, and maybe for diacritics too.
Meanwhile, there is also the issue of discoverability.
If case-fold search required memorizing a special character,
most users would not memorize it and would never use it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/02
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/02
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/09/02
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/03
RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07
RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/07
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/07
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/03