Re: inlinable functions instead of macros

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:57:58 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> On 08/18/2012 12:08 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > Could a GCC improvement be a good fix for this?  For instance, if it
> > allowed the assertion failure to find and mention the source location
> > of the function's caller?
> 
> That could be done via GCC.

What do __FUNCTION__ and __func__ hold for an inlined function?