[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:08:29 -0400 |
lisp.h:2416: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: found == !EQ
(blv->defcell, blv->valcell)
I.e. the file&line info is always the same rather than giving the
file&line where the inlinable function was called.
Could a GCC improvement be a good fix for this? For instance, if it
allowed the assertion failure to find and mention the source location
of the function's caller?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, (continued)
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/25
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/25
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/26
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/26
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Florian Weimer, 2012/08/19
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Sam Steingold, 2012/08/20