[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2011 11:25:43 -0700 |
> > That was my guess too. So the answer is to not remove "RE:".
> > I imagine it is OK to add "OT", but not to replace "RE:" with "OT:".
>
> Actually, what you should do for such OT posts is to not send them to
> the bug-tracker, since they don't belong there.
Well, sure. The question is not about off-topic posts but about kosher edits of
the Subject line. s/OT/OTHER, where OTHER is not RE.
- bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, PJ Weisberg, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/05/13