[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug tracker woes/misunderstanding
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug tracker woes/misunderstanding |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2011 07:30:36 -0700 |
Someone replied to a parenthetical comment in a bug report (#8667).
I replied. Since this side discussion was off-topic for the bug, I changed "RE"
to "OT" in the Subject line. But I left the bug number and the rest of the
Subject as is.
The bug tracker created a new bug:
bug#8670: OT: bug#8667: 24.0.50;`bounds-of-thing-at-point' returns (N . N) for
`comment'
I thought it would keep the same bug # since the # was in the Subject.
Is this a tracker bug or the intended behavior? What can we or can we not
change in the Subject line, without having a new bug created?
- bug tracker woes/misunderstanding,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13