[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding
From: |
PJ Weisberg |
Subject: |
Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2011 12:24:10 -0700 |
On Friday, May 13, 2011, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > 2. Please add information about what kinds of editing of
>> > the Subject line are no-no's (at least in the case where the
>> > recipient is address@hidden).
>>
>> No edits are allowed, period.
>
> Really? I don't think so. Unless by "allowed" you mean something other than
> "will work". Are you saying that _any_ editing of the Subject line will cause
> the message not to be handled correctly?
How about, "No edits are allowed, but some automatic checks are used
to compensate for common errors. As with all undocumented features,
the rule is 'don't push your luck'?"
--
-PJ
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, (continued)
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding,
PJ Weisberg <=
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/05/13