[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Infrastructural complexity.
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Infrastructural complexity. |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:59:11 +0900 |
Thomas Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> For very large command sets, such as found in word processors or IDEs,
> support for passive recollection command access is a good thing.
Eh? For very large command sets, tool-bars suck massively, because each
command requires physical space, all the time. They're great for
save/load/refresh, but quickly become unwieldy and ultimately almost
unusable (see: many microsoft apps, which at some point became quite
surreal in their abuse of toolbars... [and tab-bar abuse, and...]).
-Miles
--
Omochiroi!
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., (continued)
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Chong Yidong, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Chong Yidong, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity.,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/20
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Leo, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/18
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Leo, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Miles Bader, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/18
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Richard Stallman, 2009/07/18