[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Infrastructural complexity.
From: |
Thomas Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Infrastructural complexity. |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:44:38 -0700 |
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 04:24 +0200, Lennart Borgman wrote:
> I was not thinking about directly implementing them in the primitives.
> Rather in the user commands.
Bad choice of language on my part. I did not
mean "primitives" as in "functions written in
C" (although I expect there will be some impact
at that level). I meant something more like
"core" -- C prims plus the core lisp/*.el
files. "The stuff that defines the basic
model of Emacs" -- primitive in that sense.
-t
- RE: Infrastructural complexity., (continued)
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity.,
Thomas Lord <=
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/16
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Chong Yidong, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Chong Yidong, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Miles Bader, 2009/07/20
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/20