[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Infrastructural complexity.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Infrastructural complexity. |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:11:37 -0400 |
A "windowgroup" is similar to an Emacs frame, inside another emacs
frame. I like this better than using several Emacs frames.
It might be a subtle question. To think about it, I suggest looking
at by asking: What is the difference between a windowgroup and a
framelet? Or what are the various differences?
With a list of these differences, it might be possible to see a number
of different design options and what is better or worse about them.
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., (continued)
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Leo, 2009/07/17
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/18
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Leo, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Miles Bader, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., joakim, 2009/07/18
- Re: Infrastructural complexity.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/18
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/18
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- RE: Infrastructural complexity., Drew Adams, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Mathias Dahl, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/19
- RE: Infrastructural complexity., Drew Adams, 2009/07/19