[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful
From: |
Bob Rogers |
Subject: |
RE: C-x C-v considered harmful |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:05:06 -0400 |
From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:21:49 -0700
> I have no opinion about a more general option.
Nor I.
Personally, I think I would be content if we added a query only for
active process buffers.
. . .
FWIW, I've been taking advantage of `kill-buffer''s lack of query for
process buffers as a _feature_, to avoid having to type `yes' (or is
it `y'?) when I kill Emacs to confirm that I want to kill any active
processes. I've gotten in the habit of using `C-x k' or `C-x C-v'
when I'm through with a *shell* buffer, for instance. (Yes, I realize
that's as much typing as `yes'/`y', but it somehow feels less
annoying.) ;-)
I just type "quit RET" to the shell. And if I'm in an SSH session with
open tunneled connections, it won't exit immediately, so I'm reminded
that I have other state to take care of before doing C-x C-c.
-- Bob
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, (continued)
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Robert J. Chassell, 2009/07/06
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/06
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/06
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/07
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/08
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/09
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/09
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/09
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/09
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/09
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful,
Bob Rogers <=
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/13
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/16
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, M Jared Finder, 2009/07/02
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Miles Bader, 2009/07/02
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Andreas Schwab, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Miles Bader, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Markus Triska, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/05
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Bob Rogers, 2009/07/05