[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
From: |
Bob Rogers |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:42:00 -0400 |
From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:15:42 +0200
I've just made C-x C-v obey confirm-nonexistent-file-or-buffer (as they
should have from the beginning) which should fix the OP's problem.
Stefan
I'm sorry, but you seem to have misunderstood: My problem with C-x C-v
is its behavior in killing buffers, not in how it finds files. (That is
why I did not respond to your earlier post; as one who has never
*deliberately* invoked C-x C-v, I have no opinion.)
-- Bob
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, (continued)
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, M Jared Finder, 2009/07/02
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Miles Bader, 2009/07/02
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Andreas Schwab, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Miles Bader, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Markus Triska, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/05
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful,
Bob Rogers <=
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/11
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Bob Rogers, 2009/07/13
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/14
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/02