[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sending attachments
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Sending attachments |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:16:02 -0400 |
> message.el forces the loading of many other packages (I sent the list
> before). So its effective complexity includes all of them. It is
> tied in with Gnus, and can't be maintained on its own.
Message mode is actively maintained by the Gnus maintainers, so this
point is irrelevant.
It is not a good thing that message mode can only be maintained by the
Gnus maintainers.
- Re: Sending attachments, (continued)
- Re: Sending attachments, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/06
- Re: Sending attachments, Miles Bader, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/11
- Re: Sending attachments, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/11
- Re: Sending attachments, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Riley, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/07
- Re: Sending attachments,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Sending attachments, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/10
- Re: Sending attachments, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/11
- Reducing Gnus dependencies in message.el (was: Sending attachments), Reiner Steib, 2009/07/15
- Re: Sending attachments, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/03
- Re: Sending attachments, Chad Brown, 2009/07/04
- Re: Sending attachments, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/04
- Re: Sending attachments, Chad Brown, 2009/07/04
- Re: Sending attachments, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/05
- Re: Sending attachments, Daniel Pittman, 2009/07/04
- Re: Sending attachments, Miles Bader, 2009/07/04