[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:47:14 +1200 |
> > vc-dir isn't documented (but vc-directory is)...
>
> Actually, ESR updated the documentation a few weeks ago.
I missed that because it says:
You can use the
command `C-x v d' (`vc-directory')...
Presumably that should be `C-x v d' (`vc-dir').
What does vc-dir do better than vc-directory?
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, (continued)
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/06
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/04