[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:58:31 +1200 |
> > > Now, to implement this stuff vc-cvs-dir-status just needs to be changed
> > > to do
> > > (if vc-cvs-stay-local-p
> > > THE_CODE_FROM-vc-rcs-dir-status
> > > THE_CURRENT_CODE)
> >
> > Actually it might be better off using cvs-fileinfo-from-entries.
> > The only shortcoming of cvs-fileinfo-from-entries is that it won't show
> > you the "unknown" files (files that are neither ignored nor under CVS
> > control).
>
> If someone cares enough about this, there's enough information to
> implement it.
We're not talking about adding this feature but not taking it away.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/06
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05