[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:50:00 +1200 |
> vc-dir (previous "vc-status") is very much a work in progress, as you've
> seen.
In that case, do you think premature to remove vc-directory which was better
at doing some of the things vc-dir should do?
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/05