[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:37:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> > vc-dir isn't documented (but vc-directory is)...
>> Actually, ESR updated the documentation a few weeks ago.
> I missed that because it says:
> You can use the
> command `C-x v d' (`vc-directory')...
> Presumably that should be `C-x v d' (`vc-dir').
> What does vc-dir do better than vc-directory?
Mostly: speed.
Stefan
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, (continued)
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/06
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/04